Plaintiff owned a gas station next to property purchased by Defendants. Defendants were building a gas station on it. Plaintiff claimed there was a restrictive covenant that runs with its land which precludes a gas station, and that Defendants had notice of the covenant when they purchased. The Court had already refused to allow a lis pendens because it found the covenant does not run with the land and there was no notice. Plaintiff believed new evidence would convince the judge that the covenant runs with the land and/or there was advance notice.
Boundary disputes
Easement disputes
Easement for public recreation
Disputes as to removal of invasive landscaping
Disputes as to allegedly improper removal of trees and shrubs
Disputes as to nuisances and bad neighbors
Disputes between individuals and homeowners’ associations
Disputes as to neighbors damaging adjoining properties
Dispute as to public utility damaging real property
Premises liability
Suit seeing damages for personal injury due to alleged failure to provide adequate security
Suits against title insurers
Disputes as to whether monetary contributions to purchase of property were loans or investments
Disputes as to title to real property
Disputes among investors in real property
Disputes between condominium developer and buyers and investors
Dispute between owner of outdoor advertising signs and past and future renters